Exploit Total
ExploreInsightsHow it worksContact us
bySign in

© 2026 Anyday Security

FAQPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use

Product names, logos and brands are property of their respective owners. They are used here for identification only and imply no affiliation or endorsement.

ExploreInsightsHow it worksContact us
Back
Vulnerability ID

CVE-2026-64265

AI Exploitable

Use-after-free in fuse

ProductLinux kernel
CVSS 3.1High7.8
EPSS0.17%
Has public PoCNo
AI Exploitability

A working PoC was successfully generated by AI

Working AI PoC
Yes
Cheapest run
$41.15
Fastest run
2.3 hr
Model MatrixCapability BreakdownVulnerability DetailsTimelineCommunity
Sign in
Model MatrixCapability BreakdownVulnerability DetailsTimelineCommunity

Overview

View on NVD

fuse: clear intr_entry in fuse_resend and fuse_remove_pending_req When fuse_resend() moves a request from fpq->processing back to fiq->pending, it sets FR_PENDING and clears FR_SENT but does not remove the requests intr_entry from fiq->interrupts. If the request had FR_INTERRUPTED set from a prior signal, intr_entry remains dangling on fiq->interrupts. When the requesting task then receives a fatal signal, fuse_remove_pending_req() sees FR_PENDING=1, removes the request from fiq->pending and frees it via the refcount path, also without cleaning intr_entry. The stale intr_entry causes use-after-free when fuse_read_interrupt() iterates fiq->interrupts: - list_del_init(&req->intr_entry) -> UAF write on freed slab - req->in.h.unique -> UAF read, data leaked to userspace Remove intr_entry from fiq->interrupts in fuse_resend() for interrupted requests before they are placed back on fiq->pending. Add a WARN_ON if the intr_entry is not empty on request destruction.

CWE
CWE-416
Weakness
Use After Free
Component
fuse
Impact
Not stated
Published
2026-07-25
Fixed version
7.2

Risk factors

In-the-WildNot observed
CISA KEVNot listed
Public ExploitNone known
Ransomware useNone known

Severity

CVSS 3.1Only version published

7.8High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Exploitability
Attack VectorLocal
ComplexityLow
Privileges RequiredLow
User InteractionNone
Impact
ConfidentialityHigh
IntegrityHigh
AvailabilityHigh

EPSS

Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

0.17%

SSVC

Stakeholder-specific vulnerability categorization

Not scored. CISA publishes an SSVC decision for a subset of CVEs.